1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
|
There are a couple of reasons:
(from Dave Miller) Empty statements give a warning from the compiler so this is why you see #define FOO do { } while(0).
(from Dave Miller) It gives you a basic block in which to declare local variables.
(from Ben Collins) It allows you to use more complex macros in conditional code. Imagine a macro of several lines of code like:
#define FOO(x) \
printf("arg is %s\n", x); \
do_something_useful(x);
Now imagine using it like:
if (blah == 2)
FOO(blah);
This interprets to:
if (blah == 2)
printf("arg is %s\n", blah);
do_something_useful(blah);;
As you can see, the if then only encompasses the printf(), and the do_something_useful() call is unconditional (not within the scope of the if), like you wanted it. So, by using a block like do{...}while(0), you would get this:
if (blah == 2)
do {
printf("arg is %s\n", blah);
do_something_useful(blah);
} while (0);
Which is exactly what you want.
(from Per Persson) As both Miller and Collins point out, you want a block statement so you can have several lines of code and declare local variables. But then the natural thing would be to just use for example:
#define exch(x,y) { int tmp; tmp=x; x=y; y=tmp; }
However that wouldn't work in some cases. The following code is meant to be an if-statement with two branches:
if(x>y)
exch(x,y); // Branch 1
else
do_something(); // Branch 2
But it would be interpreted as an if-statement with only one branch:
if(x>y) { // Single-branch if-statement!!!
int tmp; // The one and only branch consists
tmp = x; // of the block.
x = y;
y = tmp;
}
; // empty statement
else // ERROR!!! "parse error before else"
do_something();
The problem is the semi-colon (;) coming directly after the block.
The solution for this is to sandwich the block between do and while(0). Then we have a single statement with the capabilities of a block, but not considered as being a block statement by the compiler.
Our if-statement now becomes:
if(x>y)
do {
int tmp;
tmp = x;
x = y;
y = tmp;
} while(0);
else
do_something(); |
define avec GCC.
Répondre avec citation
Partager